Mann could be said to be the Jerry Sandusky of climate science, except that instead of molesting children, he has molested and tortured data in the service of politicized science that could have dire economic consequences for the nation and planet.

Rand Simberg, from the Competive Enterprise Institute, in the wake of Louis Freeh’s report on Penn State’s complicity in serial rape, unable to dogwhistle the auditing tune.

How to Concede that P

Bart R,

I’m glad that you admit that you’re an unreliable source. Had you not admitted to something, anything, denizens (go team!) might have been tempted to classify your act (not you, as it would be against blog rules) as one reminding of a Tireless Rebutter:

Read More

(Source: judithcurry.com)

Perhaps just by coincidence

Hu McCulloch, perhaps just by coincidence.

A conspiracy to commit an offence is subject to a longer statute of limitations, even if the underlying offence committed by an individual is a misdemeanour.

Steve, getting the C word out.

That’s an awfully elaborate narrative (or series of narratives) that you’ve got there. It rather seems like you are trying to interpret things in a way that enables you to put “IPCC” and “falsified” in the same sentence, rather than investigate how well the IPCC models match up to reality.

JamesAnnan, unimpressed.

I guess these scientists are really not good at this whole “secret conspiracy” thing.

toto, spotting another divergence problem.

A conspiracy to commit an offence is subject to a longer statute of limitations, even if the underlying offence committed by an individual is a misdemeanour.

Steve evokes the C word, not that he’s accusing anyone of it, mind you.

Quasi-criminal

Steve McIntyre, not approving some amendments made in 1991.

Shame on me.

Steve, finally convinced by Ron Broberg’s proof that the page he thought has been changed to conspire against his audit.
Older posts RSS