A Diplomat Called Vaughan

[According to my confidential source, this comment by Vaughan Pratt wins the Internet forever.]

I would call it a point made in a different fork and thus not a point made in the response you claimed I ignored a part of.

Brandon, no one (modulo my remark at the bottom) is being “stupid” here as you claim. You’re running into WordPress’s inability to keep two consecutive comments together, which can be moved far apart as comments between them pile up.

Read More

(Source: judithcurry.com)

Who Damages Most?

[Vaughan Pratt offers a counterpoint to the usual YesButMike.]

Why? because his paleo argument, as it stands, really contributes very little to our understanding of sensitivity.

If you’re referring to modern sensitivity, Steven, I would agree because it is so strongly influenced by the high rate of global warming, creating a huge gap between theoretical and observed sensitivity. The argument that humankind rode out the MWP without a sweat, so to speak, is invalidated by the point that we weren’t subjected to the rapid change we experienced during the past half-century.

Read More

(Source: judithcurry.com)

The ClimateGate Burglar has saved the economy $trillions. Gleick should be pilloried for such a sick try at undermining his huge success.

Vaughan Pratt, boiling the consensus at Judy’s down to a tweetable 140 characters.

Just as the pen is mightier than the sword, so is a water pistol loaded with ink mightier than one loaded with spit.

Vaughan Pratt, falsifying a Popperian saying.

Is Greenhouse a Misnomer?

[Vaughan Pratt responds to yet another ringtone by Girma.]

Only to the extent that 1909 was a terrible year for noted physcist Robert W. Wood, whose career peaked in 1904 when he shot down Prosper-René Blondlot’s N-ray theory. Every paper Wood wrote in 1909 was shot down in the same year by one or another physicist. Yet 70 years later people started quoting Wood’s February 1909 paper in Phil Mag while ignoring the follow-up papers from the same year in the same journal shooting him down.

Read More

(Source: judithcurry.com)

The constant explains everything.

Vaughan Pratt, constantly.

Willis Eschenbach is at least as polite as McIntyre. His logic is about equal to that of McIntyre’s, which I don’t intend as a compliment to either.

Vaughan Pratt, uncomplimentarily.

Old theory: CO2 causes global warming. New theory: defining “the first decade of this century” as 2001-2011 instead of 2000-2010 causes global cooling.

Vaughan Pratt, on the pause (?)

Can we say the same about the Church of Anthropogenic Global Warming?

[Vaughan Pratt answers this question.]

Spencer titled the 8/8/05 article I cited above “Faith-based evolution.” I can see all sorts of articles organized in this way. “Faith-based AGW.” “Faith-based vaccination.” “Faith-based nanotechnology.” In general, “Faith-based X” where X is whatever corner of science or technology is currently under attack from some corner of society.

Read More

(Source: judithcurry.com)

When all hell breaks loose, turning off the lights doesn’t turn off the heat.

Vaughan Pratt, showing his Venusian side.

Lobster Logic

[Vaughan Pratt comes up with a nice metaphor.]

Suppose you and I are two lobsters in a saucepan of water on the stove. You point out that the temperature just rose from 30 C to 40 C. Then a while later you point out that it rose from 70 C to 80 C. According to you, because the rises are 10 C in both cases, the effect of these rises on us two lobsters is the same.

Maybe lobsters reason that way, but those who consume them don’t.

John, you raise an excellent question, one that was asked in the 19th century.

Vaughan Pratt, making me cheerful.
Loading