You are not alone. Here are other people like you who believes that Jones “delete” email was inappropriate, or if you know any other testimony like that, you should send it to me via my tumblog. If we all come out and say it, it will get better.
It gets better already.
On the 2010-11-18, at 09:07 Bart V admitted:
Yes, there were indeed signs of inappropriate behavior in the emails (the request to delete emails ranks number 1 imo).
(Source: collide-a-scape.com)
I suggest we return to the topic of this thread, which is not the consensus’ lack of “argument against self-interest”, the lack of good faith of the commenters, Rorschach tests that ends up making yet another thread about Rorschach theorists, and certainly not that Pachauri has been acting in a suboptimal way.
(Source: ourchangingclimate.wordpress.com)
Dave H,
Do you see that you have not acknowledged anything and that your lukewarm Gestalt therapists acknowledge everything?
(Source: ourchangingclimate.wordpress.com)
[In his response to yet another green-line test, Dave H provides a clear commentary in answer to yet another Rorschach Test by Tom Fuller. He believes he’s wasting his time. I publish this to prove that he has not.]
Aside from the loaded language in your comment, there is pretty much no way I can answer this is there? I can:
a) Honestly say I neither know nor care.
(Source: ourchangingclimate.wordpress.com)
Steve Fitzpatrick,
Perhaps this pins down our different:
I’m not sure this is at all a parallel to energy consumption/CO2 emissions.
Eating too much is bad for us, while dumping too much CO2 in the atmosphere is bad for us. Both lead to consequences that might be contrary to our objectives, if you let me use your phrasing.
What’s you take on this http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2011/2/8/steigs-method-massacred.html
I noticed that comment by Philip Bratby:
Ridiculing Eric Steig and RC is the best tactic I’m sure.
